I'm detecting a slightly more sceptical tone in this newest book by Brian Haughton.  "History's Mysteries" looks at a selection of historic puzzles, many of which have built up myths around them, where accepted history cannot yet offer definitive answers.   Each subject is covered by a chapter of about 6 pages.  Within each chapter is a concise and well written summary of the relevant known facts, an overview of the controversial issues, the archaeological efforts being brought to bear to answer the outstanding questions (where applicable), and a short conclusion by the author.  More often than not, Haughton falls into line with conventional explanations for various mysteries, although he does give a balanced summation of the various solutions offered by professional and amateur historians and archaeologists alike.  The book thus becomes a rather quirky encyclopaedia.

I enjoyed reading it, and learned a lot - mostly about things I thought I knew, but was wrong about!  For instance, Haughton explains that the myth of the return of Quetzalcoatl that hindered Moctezuma so much (when facing the threat of Cortes) was itself a myth:

"Although there is a legend that the Aztecs initially believed Cortez was the feathered serpent deity Quetzalcoatl, who was supposed to return to Mexico the same year that Cortez landed, this story is false and originated during the conquest rather than with any genuine Aztec prophecy.  It was not the strength of the Spanish army alone that overran the Aztecs, but mainly a combination of the European diseases brought over by the conquerors, which decimated Central America, and Spanish alliance with the Texcocans, the Chalca, and the Tepanecs - all previously subjugated by the Aztecs." (p114)

The books is intelligently collated, well-researched and objective.  A project such as this runs the risk of becoming a Google or Wikipedia-sourced book, but Haughton has managed to keep the text very personal.  His brand of writing is maintained throughout, which is good because he writes well.  It's a shame he didn't proof-read the text quite as well, though - there are numerous ghost words left in the text where he has re-phrased sentences and not checked them afterwards.  He would then also have spotted the sentence that simultaneously contains both Imperial and metric measurements on page 146.  But these issues do not alter the enjoyment of the knowledge imparted - it just stands out for a book reviewer.

His high-mark in debunking is on the chapter about Rennes-le-Chateau:

"When looked at more critically, the so-called "facts" of the mystery begin to crumble to dust before our eyes, and the unavoidable conclusion is that Béringer Saunière did not in fact discover a mysterious treasure in the Church of Mary Magdelene and become a wealthy man because of it."  (p37)

He is at his most revolutionary when discussing archaeological sites ripe for further investigation, like Nabta Playa in Egypt, or Goblekli Tepe in Turkey:

"That hunter-gatherer peoples could organise the construction of such a complex site as far back as the 11th or 10th millennium BC not only revolutionises our understanding of hunter-gatherer culture but poses a serious challenge to the conventional view of the rise of civilisation." (p60)

His discussion of the volcanic eruption at Thera, Greece, also opens the question of a need to alter ancient chronologies, as mooted by previous controversial writers like Velikovsky and Rohl.  So, this is by no means a completely conventional text.

My regular readers would enjoy the chapter on the Tower of Babel, which contains quite a lot of information on Mesopotamian Ziggurats.  There are other similar chapters on the Mound Builders of North America, the step pyramid at Saqqara in Egypt, and Tenochtitlan which lies under modern Mexico City.  But, curiously, nothing about the Great Pyramid.  This is an essential point about the book, I think.  It is characterised not so much by what's contained within, but what is not.  The really commonly-discussed mysteries are avoided in exchange for lesser known puzzles.  So, the mysteries surrounding Cleopatra are explored instead of, say, Akhenaten.  I think that this makes this book a rather special read - although I would have liked to have read about Homo Floresiensis in the same manner that Haughton tackled the Neanderthals.

"History's Mysteries" is a useful reference to dip into (with an extensive bibliography for further reading) as well as an enjoyable read in its own right.  Although, as a "30 Rock" fan, I can't help but put the title into the same category as the "rural juror"!

  You can order your copy through Amazon.com here:

History's Mysteries

  If you live in the UK, you can obtain your copy through Amazon.co.uk here:

History's Mysteries

Book review by Andy Lloyd, 29th April 2010

andy-lloyd@hotmail.com

 

Book Review Listings by Author and Title

 

Book Review Listings by Subject